October 24th marked the 63rd Anniversary of the United Nations.
In Article 1 of the UN
Charter, the founding member states articulated
the purposes of the organization as follows :
- To maintain international peace and security, and to
that end : to take effective collective measures for the
prevention and removal of threats to peace…..
- To develop friendly relations among nations, based on
respect for the principles of equal rights and self-determination
of peoples…..
- To achieve international co-operation in solving international
problems of economic, social, cultural or humanitarian character…..
- To be a cetner for harmonizing the actions of nations in the
attainment of these common ends.
It was a most fitting day, then, for the UN to
host a conference sponsored by the EastWest
Institute entitled, “Seizing
the Moment : Breakthrough Measures to Build a New East/West
Consensus on Weapons of Mass Destruction and Disarmament.” More
than two decades after President Ronald Reagan and President
Mikhail Gorbachev seriously discussed the abolition of nuclear
weapons at Rejkjavik, Iceland, there is renewed bipartisan
attention being given to the pursuit of a “world free
of nuclear weapons.” This is the objective set forth
by former Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger and George Schultz,
former Secretary of Defense William Perry and former
Georgia Senator Sam Nunn in two Op-Ed pieces in the Wall Street
Journal in January 2007 and January 2008.
Dr. Kissinger convened the opening panel, which included experts
from China, Pakistan, India, the United States, as well as Dr.
Mohamed El Baradei, the Director General of the International
Atomic Energy Agency. Dr. El Baradei highlighted the need for
concrete action, based on already existing treaties. Nuclear
states must actively work towards the elimination of nuclear
weapons; not an increase in their number, nor enhanced capability.
And, he added, the United States and Russia must lead the way.
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon spoke of the need for a global
initiative to build consensus, and to re-think international
security priorities. A world free of nuclear weapons, and of
all weapons of mass destruction, is a “global public good
of the highest order.” Mr. Ban reminded those present that
last year global military expenditures exceeded $1.3 trillion. “By
any definition, this has been a huge investment of financial
and technical resources that could have had many other productive
uses.” When placed within the global crises of food security,
fuel, finances and climate change, and the devastating
impact of these realities on the least developed nations, Africa,
in particular, the conversation is clearly a moral imperative.
As long as this level of military spending continues, the hoped-for
achievement of the Millenium Development Goals for the eradication
of poverty will be a distant dream.
As any other human institution, the United Nations has its own
particular shortcomings. Nonetheless, it is the only global forum
where the desires of the world for peace and security are given
pride of place. The late visionary and humanitarian Sri Chinmoy
wrote beautifully of his hopes for the United Nations and a peaceful
world. I close with some of his words of wisdom :
“To
me, the United Nations is great.
Why?
Because it has high principles.
To
me, the United Nations is good.
Why?
Because it leaves no stone unturned
To
transform these principles into living realities.”
Margaret Mayce, OP (DLC/Amityville)
NGO in Special Consultative Status
at the United Nations
Dominican Leadership Conference
211 East 43 St. Rm 910
New York, NY 10017
email: Margaret
Mayce, OP |